To the editors:
Best of Chicago voting is live now. Vote for your favorites »
As I see it, there is an unhealthy underlying assumption in what Marty is saying. It is that the purpose of the church is to maintain its institution, rather than help people. If the goal is to maintain a meaningless institution called “the church,” then by all means don’t find out how people are hurting, what questions they are asking, and how the church might best serve them in building their relationship with God. Rather, stick with the old, ignore people’s needs, and suspect any visitor that comes into your door. That will ensure that your church will suffer a slow death, and that’s what your church deserves if it takes that approach.
I pastor a tiny little church on Armitage Avenue which doesn’t even own its building, and can hardly pay its bills. But we’re growing, and most of that growth is in the individuals who make up our little community. The growth comes from a strong commitment that the church is a spiritual oasis in a wilderness of apathy and spiritual neglect. People come in and find relief, a cup of cool water (truth), and a home (fellowship), if they want one. Some stay, some go. But no one leaves without taking something meaningful with them, a thought, a book, a warm feeling, a hope for themselves or for the world, a new start on some part of their life. Certainly we want people to join us regularly. You can’t sustain a cause or a community unless you have some sort of corporation. But building the corporation is secondary to the goal of changing lives. And the church’s business is in changing lives. Church then becomes a process rather than a list of names on a piece of paper or enough bodies to cover the empty seats. And I think God would rather have us serve people who have never had a chance to know God get that chance, even if they come as easily as they go, than hold firm to the mast of a sinking ship crying out, “I can do nothing,” because I’m afraid the people I might serve might not serve me.
