Letters we couldn’t finish because we were rolling on the floor. From a dog food company: “If dogs could talk, what might they say? Chances are they would fret about fat. Sixty percent of American dogs are overweight…”

Best of Chicago voting is live now. Vote for your favorites »

Why don’t professionals fear free trade? Is it because the new global economy rewards their skills and expertise? Not likely, writes Michael Lind in Harper’s (June). “If this were so, one would expect multilingual physicists to be growing spectacularly rich rather than bond traders, corporate vice presidents, and partners in large law firms, whose skills have little or nothing to do with high technology. A more plausible explanation is that professionals in the United States benefit from a vigorously enforced form of protectionism based on credentials and licensing. A corporation can hire an Indian computer programmer to do the work of an American computer programmer for a fraction of the wage, but it cannot hire an Indian lawyer to try a case in the United States. Permit legal briefs to be written in India and submitted to American courts by fax from Indian lawyers, and legal fees in the United States would quickly plummet.”

Behind the scenes. Illinois Times’s Aaron Elstein (June 1-7), mingling at the Illinois Automobile Dealers Association Springfield barbeque for car dealers and their representatives: “The informal conversations with legislators are usually pretty brief and tend to stick to four main subjects: car sales statistics, the Chicago Bulls, families, and the importance of legislation to make it harder to sue car dealers.”

“We need to let our children in on some of the choices we make in the name of family,” Kathleen O’Connell Chesto tells the Chicago-based U.S. Catholic (June). “When I was pregnant with my third child, a high-risk specialist told me that we should perform an abortion because there was the chance that my baby would not live nor lead a normal life and that my own life was threatened. My children were only 4 and 5 at the time, but we discussed this advice. We told our children what Mom and Dad believed about life and explained my difficult pregnancies with each of them and how they had struggled to survive. As a family, we decided that we were going to go through with this pregnancy–and Liz was born. Years later I recall a dinner-time conversation when Liz told us all about a discussion her sixth-grade class had on abortion. She explained that although she didn’t agree that abortion was right, if a doctor believed that the baby is probably not going to survive nor lead a ‘normal’ life or that the mother could die, then abortion would be the right choice. And my other two kids just turned to her and in the same breath blurted out, ‘But that’s exactly what the doctor told Mom about you.’ She just went absolutely gray. It changed her thinking radically.”